Okay, I've made fun of medical research studies here and there for bizarre, useless, redundant findings, and redundant findings.
But a study published yesterday in the respected journal
Pediatrics has stunned even me.
This study found that (shocker!) overweight kids are ALMOST TWICE AS LIKELY to get teased/bullied than kids who are of average weight.
Really. They did a study to find this out.
I'm sure someone out there is going to claim I'm supporting bullying. Or making fun of the overweight. But my ONLY point here is this: does this conclusion actually surprise anyone? Was this research necessary?
Disclaimer: I was NOT a bully. I was the bully-ee. So don't look at me as someone defending the playground thug. I hated them.These researchers, using somebody's money, actually studied 821 kids in 3 elementary school grades in multiple schools across the U.S. It didn't say how long this groundbreaking research took. I can only assume that we've now learned everything there is to possibly learn in pediatrics, and so research is expanding into this sort of stuff.
Let's face it. ANYONE who grew up in the American school system (and likely
any school system on Earth, after all, Augustus Gloop was German), could have told them this. Any KID in school today could have told them this. Any PERSON who watches a playground for 10 minutes could have told them this (although more likely would be arrested for being a stranger watching a playground and taking notes).
But, to prove my hypotheses, I did my own research, using 3 renowned scientists:
Marie Grumpy is known for her
veterinary research in improving the eyesight of dogs.
Craig Grumpy is known for
techniques to convert pharmaceutical models into aquatic habitats.
Frank Grumpy, at an early age, did research into how many cardboard boxes full of adhesive band-aids can be flushed down a toilet at once (his submission to American Plunger Journal was rejected because he didn't know the alphabet at the time).
So I showed each subject 2 pictures, which I found on Google images. One showed a thin kid, and the other a not-so-thin kid. Each of my 3 associates was asked which kid Jake Rottweiler (their school bully) was more likely to pick on.
All 3, in separate questioning, and with no access to their colleagues' answers, picked the not-so-thin kid.
My project took all of 15 minutes, and cost me a $3.49 half-gallon of Cookie-Dough-Explosion ice cream (to pay my research subjects for their time).
Take that, Pediatric journal writers.