Monday, January 6, 2025

Seen in a chart

 

Thank you, Lee!

12 comments:

  1. What this means is that they used to smoke, but that what they were smoking in the early 90s wasn't tobacco.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And of course they didn't inhale - maybe this patient is Bill Clinton?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is there a statute of limitations on substance use reporting?

    ReplyDelete
  4. They must use the same questionaire and software that our local hospital does. I chewed tobacco and quit 27 years ago. The questions on the form are worded such that this same notation always shows up on my chart.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "I could never replace my dealer, David Koresh."

    ReplyDelete
  6. "I don't know what I was thinking when I got high and then went to see 'Jurassic Park,' but never again..."

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Never" doesn't always mean what it used to.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It makes perfect sense if you believe in reincarnation.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You have to take into account the "Crisis on Infinite Earths" retcon.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Schroedinger- the cigarette brand that gives you that great tobacco satisfaction! Or not!

    ReplyDelete
  11. "When I saw that look of bliss on John Travolta's face the first time I watched 'Pulp Ficiton,' that convinced me to take the leap from chasing the dragon to shooting up. I've never looked back."

    ReplyDelete
  12. As I keep telling people, to every ω-consistent recursive class κ of formulae there correspond recursive class-signs γ, such that neither ν Gen γ nor Neg (ν Gen γ) belongs to Flg(κ) (where ν is the free variable of γ).

    ReplyDelete

So wadda you think?