Tuesday, November 10, 2015

November 10, 1975



40 years ago today, 29 men died on the Edmund Fitzgerald.

In terms of shipwrecks, 29 isn't much, but if one of those is your father, or spouse, or sibling, or friend... it can be everything.

Like the recent El Faro sinking, the overwhelming lesson of the Fitzgerald is simple: the forces of nature are bigger and stronger than can be overcome by technology and metallurgy. As long as people have been sailing the seas, some have been lost to storms. In our era of GPS, radar, and satellites we're lured into believing the sea is safe. And, compared to previous eras, it is.

But the power of a storm can be far beyond our best designs. Even if you take out the factor of human error, the sheer destruction caused by storms, tsunamis, and many other natural phenomena is overwhelming.

On December 17, 1944, during WW2, the U.S. Pacific fleet lost to a violent foe. 790 men were killed. Of the 86 ships present in Admiral Halsey's Third Fleet that day, 3 destroyers were sunk and 27 other ships (including massive battleships and aircraft carriers) suffered serious enough damage that they had to return to base for extensive repairs... And the Japanese never touched them.

All of that damage was inflicted by a typhoon. Admiral Nimitz, in his report on the disaster, wrote it "represented a more crippling blow to the Third Fleet than it might be expected to suffer in anything less than a major action."


View from the carrier U.S.S. Cowpens as the storm approached.


For many, their first (and only) knowledge of the Fitzgerald comes from the Gordon Lightfoot song. That's where I first learned of it, too. But there's more.

She was named after the CEO at the time of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance, who commissioned and financed her construction. Built in 1958, she was (at the time) the biggest boat on the Great Lakes (yes, on the lake they're technically called boats), and remains the largest one ever lost there. She spent her entire career hauling ore between ports.

The lifespan of a Great Lakes freighter is generally twice that of their ocean-going counterparts. Spared the corrosive effects of saltwater, at 17 the Fitzgerald was still in overall good shape, though had the usual wear & tear all ships (and people) get with age. By 1975 she'd made 748 trips on the lakes, for a distance equivalent to circling the Earth 44 times. She set several records for ship size and loads carried.

She set out on November 9, 1975 from Superior, Wisconsin to Detroit, under the command of Ernest McSorley. A second freighter, the venerable Arthur M. Anderson (enroute to Gary, Indiana), joined her for a distance. The Anderson was skippered by Jesse Cooper.

As they sailed, a vicious November storm was brewing, though the initial predictions said it would pass south of the lake. As the day went on it moved northwards, going across the lake and taking the ships into its path.

As the afternoon of November 10 went on, they encountered winds averaging 50 mph (93 kph) with gusts up to 75 mph, and waves 35' (11m) high breaking over their decks. At 3:30 p.m. McSorley told Cooper the Fitzgerald had taken some damage and had a list. A few minutes later the U.S. Coast Guard issued an advisory for all ships to head for the nearest harbor due to the unexpected ferocity of the gale, and the 2 ships changed course for the nearby safety of Whitefish Bay.

At around 4:10 p.m. McSorley called Cooper to say his radar had been lost to the storm. In the blinding snow and rain, the Anderson closed the distance to the Fitzgerald, trying to act as the eyes for both of them with Cooper calling directions over to McSorley based on his radar plots.

Sometime around 5:30 McSorley told the coast guard he was "taking heavy seas over the deck in one of the worst seas I have ever been in."

At 7:10 Cooper radioed McSorley about the position of a 3rd ship that was now on his radar, and asked him how the Fitzgerald was doing. McSorley answered "We are holding our own."

It was the last message ever received from the Fitzgerald. A few minutes later the Anderson's radar was unable to find her, and she didn't answer the radio.

Cooper, not believing at first the Fitzgerald had been lost so quickly, gave it a few minutes to see if she showed up again on the radar sweep. He contacted the other ship nearby to see if they had her on radar (they didn't). Finally, at 7:39, he radioed the Coast Guard to sound the first warning. Unfortunately, in the violent storm the Anderson was the nearest ship to make a rescue attempt. Against his better judgment, Cooper turned around.

It must have been terrifying, knowingly going back into a storm that had just destroyed a ship bigger and more modern than yours. One of the Anderson's crewmen, upon hearing what they were doing, scribbled a last letter to his family, sealed it in a bottle, and tossed it overboard. A second freighter, the William Clay Ford, bravely joined the search that fateful night.

But there was nothing to be found. In the next few hours both the American and Canadian Coast Guards sent ships and planes to the area. Only a few pieces of debris, and a badly damaged lifeboat, ever turned up.

As news spread, the families of 29 men (ages 21 to 63) began coming to terms with their losses. Reverend Richard Ingalls, Sr., of the Mariner's Church in Detroit, rang its bell 29 times, a tradition that continued until 2006 when the service was changed to remember all lost on the Great Lakes.

Mr. Edmund Fitzgerald's son, also named Edmund Fitzgerald, died in 2013. Like his father, he was involved in many endeavors through the Midwest, though is perhaps best remembered for bringing the Brewers baseball franchise to Milwaukee.

The Arthur M. Anderson, now 63 years old, continues to work on the Great Lakes today, 40 years since that fateful night her name became forever entwined with the Fitzgerald.

The Edmund Fitzgerald lies in 2 large pieces, the bow upright and the stern inverted, in 530 feet of water, oddly straddling the American-Canadian border. The cold freshwater has kept her well-preserved and her name is still clearly visible. She's been visited several times over the years by different expeditions, though they're tightly regulated by both governments out of respect for the grave site. The ship's bell was recovered in 1995, and is now in the Great Lakes Shipwreck Museum. A replacement bell, with the names of all 29 crewmen engraved on it, was left with the ship.




In the wake of the disaster a number of regulations were changed regarding maintenance, safety equipment, weather forecasts, ship loading capacities, and annual inspections to address concerns the sinking raised. To date another large ship hasn't been lost on the lakes.

No matter what country you're reading this in, some aspect of your life depends on those who sail. Likely more than one. The clothes you're wearing, the food you eat, the computer or tablet or phone you're reading this on, the car you drive or the fuel it uses, the metals and construction materials in your home and office... may have came from somewhere else by ship.

Shipping is still, after 1000 years, one of the cheapest and most efficient ways to transport goods. All of us in our interconnected world depend on it. But never forget that for those who take the big boats to sea, sometimes the price is higher than we realize.





18 comments:

  1. Wow. Thanks for the history lesson. This is truly one of those Paul Harvey "The rest of the story" lessons.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A play was written about this incident, "Ten November," commissioned for Actors' Theater of St. Paul. I saw it there in the 1980s. See it if you ever have the opportunity.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love your history posts - the song has been running through my head for the past few days and this morning I thought "Bet Dr. Grumpy posts about it!" Thanks - I really appreciate the history lessons and learning new things about things I thought I already knew.

    (Your post about Sen. Inouye still stands out as a personal favorite - I didn't know the half of it and I am so glad I do - INSPIRING!!!)

    ReplyDelete
  4. And one can't forget Gordon Lightfoot's tribute to the Edmund Fitzgerald: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vST6hVRj2A

    ReplyDelete
  5. A sad anniversary ~ a beautiful tribute by GL

    ReplyDelete
  6. Amen, Grumpy. I've visited the Great Lakes Museum on Belle Isle many times just to see the ship's bell. Wreck diving is a popular pastime in Michigan, but everyone knows the Edmund is hallowed ground. May the families of the men of the El Faro find the answers they seek and ultimately some peace.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I attended college in Marquette Michigan, which was a port of the ore boats which carried taconite. One of the first things that you learned about Lake Superior was that survivability was measured in minutes due to the cold water temperature. So even swimming in September was a cruel experience. We were also told that the wave frequency on the lakes was different than on the ocean and as such the boats were designed differently than ocean going ships, so that they would not ride on the peaks of waves.They rode lower because of buoyancy difference between fresh and salt water. I do not know if the latter is true or not, but I can attest to how awful it was to be submerged in Lake Superior from our cliff diving at Presque Isle.
    I got to see the Edmund Fitzgerald while out there, guys used to go to "The Soo" to see boats move through the locks. Ford Motor Company, of all unlikely companies, was one of the largest shipping companies on the lakes during that period of time. It was a fascinating introduction to a completely different life.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I live in Southeast Michigan and saw the Fitzgerald a few times as a kid when my parents took us to Algonac (read, cheap entertainment) as well as at the Soo locks. Thanks for the remembrance of the ship and her crew.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I worked with a woman younger than I whose father died on one of these vessels in the Great Lakes off Michigan. My folks settled on the St. Lawrence Seaway in the late 1600s, but it is still a little strange to learn that these channels were an extension of the northern seas.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Another interesting great lake ship meets a different ending:
    http://www.retrokimmer.com/2014/02/the-benson-ford-ship-cottage-on-put-in.html

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm so impressed that you can write in several styles so very engagingly. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks for the respect to both the shipping industry and the great lakes. Lake Superior is not one to mess with in late autumn. Watching the heat inversion effect on the waves from the safety of the shore is enough for me. Add a storm to that and I'll be tucked away somewhere dry, warm, and far enough away from the shore for safety.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Love your history lessons - was also hoping you would write about this! I grew up in Superior WI and the lake is a scary force up there - and we are all too aware of the danger.... I still love visiting my family up there and watching the boats come in under the lift bridge in Duluth. Thanks for the powerful write-up and reminder about how important shipping is. PS the Brewers trivia I so didn't know!

    ReplyDelete
  14. My family is from a little island off of Sault Ste Marie Michigan. We use to go to the Locks in the Soo and watch the big boats going through the locks. My brother had a book that named the large boats on the Great Lakes and he always wanted to go so he could check off the biggest. The summer before the Edmund Fitzgerald went down we saw it going through the locks down toward the lower UP. There were a couple of crew members on the deck and they were throwing iron ore pellets to the kids watching the boats and waving. We were just a bunch of kids but we had so much fun running around trying collect the pellets. It was one of those magical childhood days. After the ship went down that winter my family always wondered if it was the same crew.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The suspicion is that the ship got the stern and bow caught high on waves on each end leaving the middle unsupported and the taconite load heavy enough to split the ship. The other hypothesis I've heard is that the bow submerged and the engines/props drove the ship into the bottom of the lake, the collision causing the ship to split. In either situation there would be no time to react. I always wondered what type of lifeboats they had on board and if the captain ordered any of the crew to be at the ready.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks for the thought-provoking post. My husband and I are both Wisconsn natives; he's from the northern part, I'm from the southern. His father grew up on the lakeshore and still remembers the foghorns trying to keep the boats safe. Sadly, they couldn't help the Edmund Fitzgerald.

    As for me, Gordon Lightfoot's ballad was my mother's favorite song. I remember bundling up against the winds many a November morning before the walk to school, and my mother exhorting me, "Be thankful you're not out on the Great Lakes." Believe me Mama, I am.

    We live in the Twin Cities now, but every November the Witch still howls over the Mississippi to remind us we're lucky not to be on the Lakes.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  17. Have been to the shipwreck museum. When you get there it doesn't look like much, but inside there is a ton of information on the many, many ships lost on the lakes.

    We also waded in to the water, in August...and waded right back out. Very, very cold.

    Rick, yet another theory is that the ship hit the bottom during drop in between the huge waves. Oh, and also that a hatch cover was leaking. Both of these theories are supported by the reported listing.

    ReplyDelete

So wadda you think?