Friday, November 13, 2009

Say WHAT?

I'm reading through hospital records on a patient who's coming in later today. They include a consult note from another local neurologist, which contained this statement:


"This patient's confusion is from a multifactorial toxic-metabolic encephalopathy. This is primarily caused by, but not limited to, multifactorial causes from multifactorial medical issues, multifactorial medications, and other multiple multifactorial factors. Multifactorial treatments focused on addressing these multiple multifactorial issues may or may not result in a polyfactorial and/or multifactorial improvement in his multifactorial toxic-metabolic encephalopathy."

51 comments:

  1. Well, that certainly clears up any confusion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Maybe its a test to see if anyone is reading the chart?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is the word of the day multifactorial?

    ReplyDelete
  4. So, I'm thinking he basically had no clue what was wrong and was trying to make that sound better. Wow, the s**t you have to wade thru.....

    ReplyDelete
  5. you have GOT to be kidding me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So, like, this patient's confusion is from a lot of stuff, and is caused by a lot of stuff, as well as a lot more stuff, and should be treated by a lot of stuff, which may or may not improve stuff.

    But I'm easily confused.

    ReplyDelete
  7. multiple multifactorial factors... I'm definitely using that.

    -Flavius

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sounds like a kid trying to make their papers longers but don't know what to write.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I know. And it's not like we get paid by the syllable or word.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Multiple multifactorial- that's a whole lotta something. And I think we're knee deep in it!

    Thank heavens he tried mutifactorial treatments- what else could he do?

    Better yet, if we're lucky the patient might get polyfactorial and/or multifactorial improvement. Isn't that what we all want for our patients?

    ReplyDelete
  11. So, multifactorial is the new "umm" or "like." You just through it in there to fill up space.

    ReplyDelete
  12. omg... this isn't for real, right? creative license and all?

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's real.

    This guy is known for redundant verbosity redundance, though this was impressive even by his standards.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Maybe he has Tourette's and he's had a lot of therapy to make him say "multifactorial" instead of "fucking."

    ReplyDelete
  15. Invite him out some night for a drinking game with one of his reports. You do the reading, make him do the drinking. Maybe the hangover could be educational.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "Hello? Department of Redundancy Department."

    *shakes head*

    Let's see if I understand this statement right (I'm an engineer):

    The Patient's confusion is caused by a toxic-metabolic encephalopathy with more than one cause, whether it be medications or other issues and causes. It may take more than one type of treatment to get everything and even then it may not work... entirely.

    Does that about cover it? *wry* (or am I totally wrong here...)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hey, Derownsh Man...

    "This patient's confusion is from a fucking toxic-metabolic encephalopathy. This is primarily caused by, but not limited to, a lot of fucking causes from fucking medical issues, fucking medications, and other multiple fucking factors. Fucking treatments focused on addressing these multiple fucking issues may or may not result in a really fucking and/or merely fucking improvement in his fucking toxic-metabolic encephalopathy."

    I say, I think he's got it!

    >:p

    Doris

    ReplyDelete
  18. Idiopathic.

    That's all I have to add.

    ReplyDelete
  19. So basically the doctor is like... "Well I have no clue what is going on so I am going to send him to Dr. Grumpy. However I have no clue what is wrong... How do I possibly make this sound like I am not a complete idiot." And out comes the the world's most no committal paragraph. And severe abuse of the word multifactoral.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'm hoping he dictates and rambles without realizing what he's rambling about because it's particularly scary if he actually wrote that stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hm, sounds like someone needs to buy him a thesaurus.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The Patient's confusion is from listening to the doctor speak speak multifactorially. This multifactorial issue is caused by multifactorial and/or polyfactorial issues of the multifactorial nature. ... Multifactorial.

    I wonder, did that doctor get his degree from Multifactorial University?

    ReplyDelete
  23. ahhhh, another example of mastering the art of speaking without saying anything!

    ReplyDelete
  24. reminds me of Supper Troopers and how many times can I saw meow or in this case multifactorial.p

    ReplyDelete
  25. Doc that consult note is just ridiculous, he goes from multifactorial to POLYfactorial. Poly....Seriously?

    Pharmacy Jocky that comment has all kinds of WIN in it. Love Super Troopers! Alright meow....

    ReplyDelete
  26. I think it was a game to see how many times he could (she) use the word multifactorial in one day. Must've been the word of the day...

    ReplyDelete
  27. HuH??? Clear as mud--stumbling verbage personified!
    CP

    ReplyDelete
  28. Hang on... the difference between multifactorial and polyfactorial is.... a few letters of the alphabet??!

    I guess that he may have thought perhaps that multifactorial had been used a tad too much so put another word in there from the Idiot's Guide to Thesaurus' lol.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Sounds like a psychiatrists dictation. I did not think anyone read their notes besides themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I would give this person a wide berth in the hallways....

    ReplyDelete
  31. I would refuse to believe that this was dictated/written by an actual physician, except that you're the one telling us about it.

    Re: Doris' interpretation-- I'd much rather read the cussing. It's more straightforward!

    ReplyDelete
  32. He has OCD, and has to use the word "multifactorial" nine times in each patient assessment, or else he has to go back and rewrite it?

    ReplyDelete
  33. I almost wonder if he tried Law or business school before he became a doctor

    ReplyDelete
  34. I feel for the person who had to listen to this crap dictation!

    ReplyDelete
  35. I think we're being too hard on the guy. All he's trying to say is, "patient needs a good poop."

    ReplyDelete
  36. It sounds like this patient has a poor prognosis...

    ReplyDelete
  37. In Georgia I had an attending (who used to round in overalls) who had a famous quote on rounds:

    "What in the hell did you just say?"

    I can hear him in my mind reading this consult note.

    ReplyDelete
  38. what's the main factor in the patients prognosis?

    ReplyDelete
  39. I think it's the doctor who has a poor prognosis.

    ReplyDelete
  40. read between the lines. it means the patient is crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Coming from working previously as a medical secretary, I would HATE to have to transcribe his dictation. Whoever does can not be getting paid enough. YIKES!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  42. LOL Doris & Derownsh

    CYA at its best.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Make sure there is a multidisciplinary meeting to discuss the biopsychosociospiritual aspects of this complex and multifactorial case.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Grumpy, you should call in some Aricept for this guy. I don't think he'd be able to manage to write the script himself.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Is the patient the one who's confused or the doctor?

    ReplyDelete
  46. Doris: That was awesome!

    Thanks Doc Grumpy.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Guarantee the doc or the transcriptionist is a stoner. Either or.
    It sounded good at the time, man.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Now I know why people rely on Craigslist's forums for a diagnosis.

    ReplyDelete

So wadda you think?